|
|
Post by mojo on Nov 3, 2007 12:43:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lost on Nov 3, 2007 14:55:37 GMT -5
jews -.-
|
|
|
|
Post by lost on Nov 4, 2007 1:12:00 GMT -5
this is what i dont understand, you guys have ss's of veri using nades and stuff and i xfired you that he was, it was fun until then. Then it was just gay... Someone replied, and this is all he got..  an hour later, he was glitching again... |
|
|
|
Post by Gen.Wright on Nov 4, 2007 2:17:47 GMT -5
Veritas will be banned for a few days when he is next seen on. Perhaps just maybe this will help him to be not so eager to glitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by missy on Nov 4, 2007 9:24:36 GMT -5
Wait a second... now this is what confuses me..... Now they warned him.. and yes it has a bit of a joking manner in it.. however, that wasn't enough... you expected a ban? Now UC (in general) can't have it both ways here... either there is a warning or a ban first.. which is it? And i said UC specifically because it has been masta/daniel that has been in most of these discussions...lol not to pick on anyone....lol
This is a perfect example on how you can't please everyone all the time, and people should let the admins run it they way they see fit....:/
no disrespect anyone, just venting (writing it out)....lol
|
|
|
|
Post by lost on Nov 4, 2007 11:36:48 GMT -5
He been warned and warned again... Everytime there is no admin he glitches, i like veri, but im sick of playing with idiots that nade you...
Obviously the warning didn't work, when wright and premium signed off xfire, he was glitching again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cpt.Premium on Nov 4, 2007 11:49:10 GMT -5
i may have seen veri glitch nades once. he hasnt been warned over and over again =\
i agree with missy. lol go missy!
also it wasnt me on console lol idk who it was?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gen.Wright on Nov 4, 2007 13:15:05 GMT -5
That was me.
|
|
|
|
Post by lost on Nov 4, 2007 13:36:30 GMT -5
You saw him once, warned him. Wright saw him, warned him again, I've seen other Consoles warn him. w/e, im just saying..
|
|
|
|
Post by mojo on Nov 4, 2007 14:24:35 GMT -5
eh I don't mean to start conflict with this. Just that I keep getting naded and fast fired by numerous people and I am starting to get sick of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by missy on Nov 4, 2007 16:12:42 GMT -5
Well, i have to say I honestly start playin cod in Elite server, then when someone starts nading and glitchin.. there is a group of us that decide to either go to 3id or to DD, where someone has admin so we can control it...:/
|
|
|
|
Post by masta on Nov 8, 2007 19:07:31 GMT -5
Wait a second... now this is what confuses me..... Now they warned him.. and yes it has a bit of a joking manner in it.. however, that wasn't enough... you expected a ban? Now UC (in general) can't have it both ways here... either there is a warning or a ban first.. which is it? And i said UC specifically because it has been masta/daniel that has been in most of these discussions...lol not to pick on anyone....lol This is a perfect example on how you can't please everyone all the time, and people should let the admins run it they way they see fit....:/ no disrespect anyone, just venting (writing it out)....lol dont generalize and call out our entire clan for what one person says. what i say, is what i personally say. on these forums, unless specified, i represent solely myself and am not speaking on my clans behalf, as is daniel, and as is lost. i have no affiliation with losts opinions unless i state that i agree. you always seem to express flaws with other people or other clans. i think that is extremely rude. |
|
|
|
Post by missy on Nov 9, 2007 8:49:52 GMT -5
Oh masta, come on I specifically said i wasn't picking on UC.... if you didn't get that... sorry. THE REASON I DID.. is cus most of the complaints about were from Daniel and Lost, who are infact in UC. I don't express anything that hasn't been pointed out already, yes I add my opinion, which is just that, mine. You constantly do the same thing, so i guess that makes both of rude eh? LOL <3
|
|
|
|
Post by masta on Nov 9, 2007 13:10:01 GMT -5
whether or not you say you werent picking on uc, doesnt mean you were or were not.
you singled out our clan, a clan comprised of 35+ members, based on the opinion of 2 individual.
if you check all my posts, i have actual factual support on everything i say. whereas the majority of your posts, other than those supplying complementary demos, are more implications other people have stated that you choose to reword, or put your personal opinion on.
theres a difference between having an opinion on an issue, and voicing your opinion of what someone said or what they meant by saying it.
and if you think you dont do that. read the post you just made. you told me what i do when i post by making a comparison to yourself.
thats your opinion about how i choose to express myself, which is the fundamental flaw now evident.
i am only posting this because several of my members were taking great offense to you generalizing them in this way, when they have no affiliation with lost or daniel, and pointed out that you have done this quite often recently.
i personally have nothing against you. missy police ftw
|
|
|
|
Post by missy on Nov 9, 2007 16:40:14 GMT -5
I don't have anything against you either Masta. <3 But how can people who wear the same clan tags have no affiliation? That's contradicting in itself. (They may not talk or hang out, but they all represent the same clan). I do generalize clan's and their members....(as alot of peple do) reason being is that if someone that is wearing MY tags, says or does something.. it does reflect upon me (whether or not i agree with what they said or did). However, as I did in my last post, I apologized, was that not good enough?  Oh and btw... I need someone to delete my old account on your forums.. and i was told to talk to you about it... ;D |
|
