|
Post by 2Lt.Stalin on Aug 29, 2007 21:38:15 GMT -5
nice list, but I would say diablo would be higher on the list, but thats me.
|
|
rob
Full Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by rob on Aug 29, 2007 21:39:00 GMT -5
I posted what i thought of this list on unreal forums if anyone cares.
In short, the list is still terrible, its pointless, and your just adding on by making another list for people to gripe about.
|
|
|
Post by Cpt.Premium on Aug 29, 2007 21:42:43 GMT -5
yeah, i posted on yours. and yeah we made it pretty quick, and it was just for fun. we knew people would gripe and theres alot of people we missed, but we wanted to make our own version of a list. we probably shouldnt have now that i think about it, or we shouldnt have posted it... but what can i say, we were bored.
|
|
|
Post by Gen.Wright on Aug 29, 2007 21:42:58 GMT -5
What is this crap rome, haha, some of your lists decent, but Molech 48? Are you insane? Molech when he has good ping is at least as good as diablo, who is also listed really low on the list in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Cpt.Molech on Aug 29, 2007 21:50:26 GMT -5
see what happens when you got to work all the time and can't play...ya just slip down to #48! j/k...remember when i moved...i wasn't on in like a month...i would have been like #88944! haha ...i'm flattered to make the list, but rob is right...kind of hard to judge all that and doesn't do much beside boost ego's of self righteous airheads and frustrate prideful jerks.
that's my $.02 tho -- no harm done tho
|
|
|
Post by SSgt.Soljah on Aug 29, 2007 22:03:52 GMT -5
I prolly dont deserve being on it!
|
|
|
Post by masta on Aug 30, 2007 1:29:14 GMT -5
eh the only problem wiht the list is who created it. there was no real diversity in the people who created it. you all talk a fair amount, and have relatively the same opinions, so there was no other perspective on skill. its hard to make an accurate list to total all of 1.3 with 1 opinion. i could do the same thing and just make a list of all the people i think are good, and i guarentee it would be quite different. not saying it would be more correct, but you just gotta have diversity in creation
fun list tho haha, drop me out tho lol
|
|
|
Post by Cpt.Molech on Aug 30, 2007 6:38:44 GMT -5
Remnants of reminiscence from a CoD player:
True, perception is the slave of perspective. While i may have a clan-mate (Measles) who was very good...or a player like Logan who would whip all of us, many ppl don't know them.
Even in players that are still around. You see your clan mates best and worst, but the average is what is perceived by third parties.
Also, i'm a very trusting person, but if you take a look at an academic class, their top 50 students, has cheaters in it...NOT DUMB CHEATERS, but cheaters who are good at it...and no one else can tell.
And...the dispensation (time period/age) of CoD1.3 must be taken into perspective. There used to be a day x-hairing and clipping didn't exist. (GASP...CAN IT BE TRUE...is it possible to play CoD w/o them) Yes, and these things revolutionized the game. Teams don't rely on skill and tactic anymore as much as they do force w/ a touch of luck. The game has kind of been cheapened...but that's only an opinion which no one should take offense to.
|
|
|
Post by masta on Aug 30, 2007 11:22:21 GMT -5
ha ha yeah molech i agree. and also for old cod fogeys like myself that have been playing since pretty much the day the game came out, we've also seen some real amazing player back in the day that also just got bored and stopped playing. you couldve been around, i just didnt see you.
but yeah i agree
|
|
|
Post by Cpt.Molech on Aug 30, 2007 11:29:39 GMT -5
players also change...even in elite, we had players who once did very well and now struggle to keep up...we also have players who struggled to keep up before,but now do very well!
|
|
|
Post by Cpt.Payne on Aug 30, 2007 12:06:42 GMT -5
lol...rome is on this list...as soon as i get a long enough ethernet cord to run to my room i should be back on to roll #40
|
|
|
Post by 2Lt.Stalin on Aug 30, 2007 16:23:28 GMT -5
Bring the Payne!
|
|